As many of you may know, I've been writing about vaccines for a few years and have spent several hundred hours researching the pros and cons of getting vaccinated or not vaccinated. I hope I've gotten some of you to start doing your own research so you can make an informed choice.
What about the pro and anti vaxx labels? Well, since pro-vaxx people want everyone vaccinated, I would have to say that anti-vaxx people would want no one vaccinated.
That being the case, I doubt you would be able to find anyone who is actually anti-vaxx. What they actually want is, to varying degrees:
1. Pro-informed choice, pro-freedom, pro human rights, pro Nuremberg Code.
2. They are probably anti human experimentation and against human rights violations.
3. They are most likely well educated and have probably done at least some research, or they know of someone who was injured or killed by a vaccine, perhaps even their own child.
4. They probably don't much care for playing Russian Roulette with their children.
5. They may not trust the following substances being injected into themselves or their children: mercury, aluminum, MSG, polysorbate 80, GMOs, glyphosate, lead, retroviruses, various other contaminants, aborted fetal cells, monkey cells, and on and on.
6. They probably don't like that vaccine makers have no liability, thus no motivation to make the vaccines safe, or at least safer.
What about the pro-vaccine people? There are a few different classes of those.
1. There are those who have been brainwashed by the media (who are basically owned by the drug companies) into believing if everyone doesn't get vaccinated, it will be the end of the world. All they need to do is some basic research from independent sources and use some logic to see that is false. (NOTE: at the end of this article is a paragraph on the logic regarding vaccines)
2. There are those who profit from the sale of vaccines, which include the drug companies, doctors, the media, the CDC, and the government in the form of political donations.
3. The trolls and shills (these are probably the worst of the bunch, although doctors who bully their patients may have them beat) who will attack and try to discredit anyone who posts anything that may hurt their profits from the sale of vaccines. They will call doctors who disagree with them quacks and say that those doctors have been discredited (and many times they have been, by the same forces that want vaccines for all). They will call you uneducated, illiterate, ignorant, along with other insults, and worse, and may claim to be highly educated. They will ask you to cite any and all studies that back up what you say, but if you do, they will say those studies have been discredited and/or have been shown to be faulty when, in fact, the studies they cite are faulty and/or poorly designed. The real tip-off is that they will post more than anyone else, discrediting anyone who disagrees with them, all the while lying like they really don't understand the difference between those lies and truth and honesty - because they don't. They will never suggest you do research from independent sources. They may call YOU dangerous (and you are....to their profits) while their vaccines are killing and injuring your children. They are good at twisting and turning facts against you. I ran into one that even intimated that longterm studies have been done - they haven't. One more thing - they will always deny that they are paid shills or trolls - they are liars, after all. They will never say anything like the following (a favorite quote of mine): "It astounds me how people never learn, and simply accept what is suggested to them by those writing articles, or those speaking on television, as gospel. Have we lost the ability to think critically? Have we lost the ability to question what we are told based upon actual facts? Or have we simply adopted the "Foghorn Leghorn perspective: "Don't bother me with facts, son. I've already made up my mind.""
_________________________________________________________________________________
LOGIC. COMMON SENSE, and STATISTICS: U.S. Supreme Court said vaccines are UNAVOIDABLY UNSAFE." Why do drug companies have no vaccine liability? Those who want mandatory vaccines say that if people stop vaccinating, all those diseases will come back with a vengeance - well, by age 28, all the childhood vaccines have worn off, and less than half of adults get vaccinated, so where are all the epidemics (pandemics?) and why aren't all the adults dropping dead like flies from all those diseases? If vaccines are effective, why are most outbreaks happening in vaccinated populations (especially China where 99.5% of the population is vaccinated, and they are having outbreaks)? Why would anyone care if someone's child wasn't vaccinated if yours was, as yours would be immune to all those diseases if vaccines were effective? If they are safe, why have there been over 60,000 deaths (perhaps much higher) in VAERS (where less than 1 in 10 actually gets reported according to CDC, maybe as little as 1 in 100 - I've multiplied by just a factor of 10), E.R. visits - over 2 million, Hospitalized - over 600,000, Life-Threatening - over 110,000, and Disabled - over 82,000. Here's a chart from the CDC for 2014 Pertussis cases
(https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/downloads/pertuss-surv-report-2014.pdf) - notice in the lower right chart that over 5x as many cases reported in those who got the 3+ recommended vaccines compared to those who did not get the vaccine. The above does not take into account the possible long-term side effects which are unknown as there are no studies available for this. Did you know that to save one person from getting meningitis, the meningococcal vaccine will have killed three people and injured much more? More people die and are injured by vaccines than from the diseases they are supposed to prevent (according to statistics from VAERS and CDC). If you look at graphs of diseases from the 1800s to the present, and where vaccines came in, you'll see that most diseases were almost already gone. Check the graph for scarlet fever - there was no vaccine for that. Why aren't people still getting it (hint - better hygiene, cleaner drinking water, more knowledge about disease, etc.)? And finally, why have there been almost no comparison studies in the U.S. between vaccinated and unvaccinated people (there were a couple in Europe showing vaccinated children less healthy than unvaccinated)? BTW - there are more than enough who don't want vaccines, for the study. If those who want vaccines would do some research, fact checking, use some common sense and logic, they would most likely change their mind (unless, of course, they profit). Instead, most of them accuse those who actually have done the research of not doing research and those who want safe vaccines or the freedom to choose are called anti-vaxx. I wonder if they call those who want safe highways, anti-highway. I wonder if they call the U.S. Supreme Court anti-vaxx for calling vaccines unavoidably unsafe. No doubt they would call you that if you said what SCOTUS said. I know all this won't change the opinions of those who want everyone vaccinated as they seem incapable of logic and common sense or of research from independent sources. Or perhaps they profit from vaccines.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment