Wednesday, May 9, 2018

About Vaccines, Drugs, Violence, and Shootings - A Theory

Regarding vaccines in the news and even on the talk shows, there is unrelenting bias, unfair news coverage, and fake news.  When a person or someone with influence tries to influence others to do something that can and does injure and kill, that is irresponsible.  That was and is what the mainstream media, doctors, nurses, drug companies, etc., do regarding the vaccine debate.  Please see my prior post about vaccines and common sense and logic.

Without going into great detail, here is one theory about what has lead to most of the (mass) shootings.  For that, let's start at the beginning of life.  The first exposure to vaccines for a new life now happens during pregnancy.  The first neurotoxins are introduced to the fetus's evolving brain.  Then on the first day of life, the baby is given a hep B vaccine - for what reason?  To protect him/her from unprotected sex or sharing of needles?  And then at 2, 4, and 6 months, many more vaccines with lots of aluminum, mercury, GMOs, glyphosate, heavy metal contaminants, foreign cells and DNA, and on and on.  Depending on the baby's genetics, he/she will have a minimum to maximum amount brain damage.  For the next 17.5 years, he/she will have received a total of around 70+ vaccines with varying amounts of all the neurotoxic ingredients.  This will likely lead to behavioral problems, perhaps minor or severe depending on genetics.  Plus many other health problems, including depression.  Next come the drugs to treat these problems, all of which have side effects up to and including violent behavior and suicide.

Adding to the above are all the environmental toxins (glyphosate, pesticides, fluoride in our water, chemicals in our food, etc.) which further add to the above problems.

So now we have brain damaged people on drugs with access to guns.  What could possibly go wrong?  We've already seen the answer to that.  Most, if not all, of the mass shooters had been on drugs for various health problems such as depression, anger, etc.  Sadly, if my theory is correct, the shootings will become more frequent as time goes by.

The initial 24/7 coverage in the news of the shootings is also likely having an influence on the number of shootings.  The media may as well say, "If you want to become famous, just go out and copy what that person did and we'll make sure your name gets publicized and that you'll get your 15 minutes (hours, days?) of fame."

Now, let's compare some numbers.

Florida school shooting - 17 died on that day.
Since 2012, 158 have been killed in school shootings, or 1 every 11 days.
Vaccines - An average of at least 35 die every day from reactions to vaccines.
Prescription Drugs - About 300 die every day from the side effects of those.
Medical Errors - About 270 die every day from those.
Hospital Infections - About 250 die every day from those.
Hospital Malnutrition - About 310 die every day from this.

To look at this another way, 13,000 times more people die from these other preventable causes than from school shootings.  Where are the marches?  Why aren't people up in arms?  Why is nothing being done?  Could it be because that the drug companies/medical profession pay about 70% of the medias revenue and make billions of dollars from their drugs/vaccines so these problems are not reported to the public?

I was going to publish this sooner but decided to wait until emotions died down a bit.  Please don't think I'm downplaying the school shootings.  But if we fix the vaccine and drug problem (and promote healthy nutrition), perhaps the school shooting problem will fade away or at least diminish in number.  Life is sacred - no one should be doing anything that will end someone else's life, whether it's someone with a gun or vaccines or drugs.

Rather than try to fix the problems by reacting after the fact, the cause of the problem needs to be fixed.  That can be done with a healthy diet, exercise, supplements, lowering stress levels, better sleep, etc., rather than trying to fix problems with vaccines and drugs.  Unfortunately, we are going in the opposite direction with no change anytime soon.

Saturday, April 7, 2018

Logic, Common Sense, and Vaccines

This is a little long (or perhaps not), but some things to think about:  LOGIC. COMMON SENSE, and STATISTICS: U.S. Supreme Court said vaccines are "UNAVOIDABLY UNSAFE."  Why do drug companies have no vaccine liability?  Those who want mandatory vaccines say that if people stop vaccinating, all those diseases will come back worse than ever - well, by age 28, all the childhood vaccines have worn off, and less than half of adults get vaccinated, so where are all the epidemics (pandemics?) and why aren't all the adults dropping dead like flies from all those diseases?  If vaccines are effective, why are most outbreaks happening in vaccinated populations (especially China where 99.5% of the population is vaccinated, and they are having outbreaks)?  Why would anyone care if someone's child wasn't vaccinated if yours was, as yours would be immune to all those vaccine-preventable diseases if vaccines were effective?  If they are safe, why have there been over 60,000 deaths (perhaps much higher) in VAERS (where less than 1 in 10 actually gets reported according to CDC, maybe as little as 1 in 100 - I've multiplied by just a factor of 10), E.R. visits - over 2 million, Hospitalized - over 600,000, Life-Threatening - over 110,000, and Disabled - over 82,000.  Here's a chart from the CDC for 2014 Pertussis cases (Chart).  Notice in the lower right chart that over 5x as many cases reported in those who got the 3+ recommended vaccines compared to those who did not get the vaccine.  The above does not take into account the possible long-term side effects which are unknown as there are no studies available for this.  Did you know that to save one person from getting meningitis, the meningococcal vaccine will have killed three people and injured much more?  More people die and are injured by vaccines than from the diseases they are supposed to prevent (according to statistics from VAERS and CDC). If you look at graphs of diseases from the 1800s to the present (Article with Lots of Graphs), and where vaccines came in, you'll see that most diseases were almost gone when the vaccines arrived.  Check the graph for scarlet fever - there was no vaccine for that, so you can't give vaccines credit for that.  Why aren't people still getting it?  Why do many, if not most, doctors not vaccinate?  And finally, why have there been almost no comparison studies in the U.S. between vaccinated and unvaccinated people (there were a couple in Europe showing vaccinated children less healthy than unvaccinated)?  I know, that last question is a tough one, but if you actually spend some time on it, you'll figure it out (and no, they wouldn't be sacrificing the unvaccinated because there are around a million children who do not get vaccinated - see the logic of that below).  If those who wanted everyone to get vaccines would actually do some research, fact checking, use some common sense and logic, perhaps they would find the truth.  Instead, they accuse those who actually have done the research of not doing research and those who want safe vaccines are called anti-vaxx.  I wonder if they call those who want safe highways, anti-highway.  I wonder if they call the U.S. Supreme Court anti-vaxx for calling vaccines unavoidably unsafe.  No doubt they would call you that if you said what SCOTUS said.  I know all this won't change the opinions of those who want everyone vaccinated as they seem incapable of logic and common sense or of doing research from independent sources.  Then again, perhaps they are profiting from vaccines.

A word about the comparison studies they refuse to do (by "they" I mean the government and vaccine people) that would compare health and disease rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated people.  The reason they give, and this would be funny if it wasn't so tragic, is that it would be unethical to deprive vaccines to the million or so children who don't want and refuse to get vaccines (because those families probably have done the research).  That's right, they say it's unethical to deprive them of vaccines that are known to kill and permanently injure a certain percentage of children who get them, but it's OK to try to force those vaccines on them!  In other words, it's ethical to kill and injure but not to compare.  One has to wonder if perhaps the makers of vaccines are vaccine injured or they think everyone else is.

A favorite quote that relates to this very well:  "It astounds me how people never learn, and simply accept what is suggested to them by those writing articles, or those speaking on television, as gospel. Have we lost the ability to think critically? Have we lost the ability to question what we are told based upon actual facts? Or have we simply adopted the "Foghorn Leghorn perspective:  "Don't bother me with facts, son. I've already made up my mind.""

Thanks to vaccines, there will be generations of people who not only can't think critically but may not be able to think much at all.  Autism is already affecting 1 out of 36 and still increasing exponentially.  But they keep denying the connection between vaccines and autism, even though vaccines contain several known neurotoxins (mercury, aluminum, lead, Glyphosate, MSG, etc., plus loads of other crap).  Here is a link to one of the latest studies on Aluminum and Autism - Aluminum and Autism.  Never forget how long they denied that smoking caused cancer and said smoking was actually good for you.  It cost my father his life - he had been a heavy smoker for many years and although he quit in his mid-50s, he still died from lung cancer.  One of their favorite arguments about all the deaths and injuries caused by vaccines - it was coincidental.  That's the "logic" they use.

Thursday, January 11, 2018

What to Look for in Supplements (Vitamins, Minerals, Herbs, etc.)

Do the vast majority of people need supplements?  In my opinion, YES.  Why?  No matter how healthily you eat, the food today isn't what it was 100 years ago.  It may be grown in poor soil, it may have sat on the shelf for days, and you may not be getting the variety you need, especially if you have a poor diet of fast foods and processed foods.  So you need to fill in the gaps with a good multivitamin and perhaps a variety of other supplements to support different parts of your body, such as your joints, heart, circulation, brain, immune system, etc.

There are people who have told me, "why spend money on all those supplements, you're going to die anyway?"  Well, there is a big difference between living healthy and living sick before your time is up, not to mention you can add many years of life to your life by being healthy.  I've mentioned in prior posts the difference it has made in my life (eliminated countless health problems).  Assuming you want the best health, what should you do besides eating an organic whole foods diet?

Take the best supplements you can afford.  The first choice would be food grown vitamins and minerals.  Next would be food-based multivitamins.  And finally, a good general multivitamin.  Make sure you check "other ingredients."  If it contains talc, polysorbate 80, fructose, HFCS, artificial sweeteners, don't buy it - the vitamins and minerals are also likely to be in poor forms that aren't absorbed well.  If vitamin E is listed as dl-alpha ________, don't buy that multi.  It should be d-alpha tocopherol (without the "l").  Mixed tocopherols (alpha, beta, gamma, delta) are better.

If you need calcium, always get it with magnesium, and take vitamin D3 and vitamin K1 and K2-MK7 with it.  Rather than go over every mineral and vitamin form available (for example, there are at least 6 forms of magnesium alone, and each does something a little different).  Some magnesium supplements contain several forms in one.  You can google "magnesium best form" and find the differences between each form.

As for other ingredients, the best other ingredient list is when there are none (in many organic herbal powders), other than perhaps the capsule, or a few other natural ingredients.  No soy, unless it's non-GMO soy.  Only organic herbs, if you take herbs.  I take several in powder form so there are no other ingredients and put them in my smoothie.  And only the L form (never DL, except for DLPA should you need that one) of amino acids, should you take those.  Below are a few supplement forms to look for in a good multi:

For zinc - OptiZinc
For Selenium - Seleno-methionine
For Chromium - Chromate
Vitamin D - as D3
Vitamin E - as D-Alpha (NOT dl-)

If your multi contains the above forms, it will most likely not have bad other ingredients and probably will have good forms of its other vitamins.  I would stay away from drugstore brands.  I  wouldn't get or take Centrum even if they paid me (has artificial color, talc, preservatives (BHT), dl-alpha form of vitamin E, and even Hydrogenated Palm Oil, plus other ingredients that I have no idea what they are in there for).

One of the other supplements I take is MSM.  Best form is OptiMSM (by Doctor's Best).  It has two ingredients - MSM and the capsule.  I take 1000mg for joint support, allergy support, and sometimes in higher doses for pain.

Hope you got some good information here.  Remember to always check ingredients for food or supplements.  Wishing you all best of health and happiness in 2018.